Security review

Is cgx-mcp-server-docker MCP safe to give an agent?

unknownverifiedunmaintainedhealthy

A factual risk summary built from cgx-mcp-server-docker’s real tool surface, execution model, and verification history — not a vibe. Trust score 38/100.

01What it can do

No tool handshake yet — capability surface unverified.

0 tools observed

02Execution model

Runs on the vendor's infrastructure; you connect over the network. No untrusted code runs on your machine, but you grant the hosted service access.

Installs via uvx (`uvx cgx-mcp-server-docker`) — it pulls and executes third-party code; pin versions and review the source.

03Permissions & auth

No auth scopes captured yet (scope extraction runs during the sandboxed handshake, gated until configured). Treat unconfirmed scopes as unknown, not as “none.”

04Verification

handshakenot confirmed

runsmetadata:passed · metadata:passed

last_checked2026-06-29 07:36Z

sourcesPyPI [p4]

Reduce the risk

Wrap cgx-mcp-server-docker in a governed Loadout — scoped permissions, approval rules on write/destructive tools, and audit logging — instead of handing your agent raw access.

Build a governed Loadout

See also: full server page · setup · alternatives